Nietzsche: A Terrible Writer?

During the last discussion, there were some people who believed Nietzsche to be a terrible writer, simply due to the fact that his arguments were less than completely clear and concise— or, in other words, idiot-proof. However, I believe this notion regarding Nietzsche's writing prowess to be less than valid. Nietzsche writes like this, in my opinion, because he doesn't care whether or not most people understand him. He believes most of the world to be stupid, and it is unimportant that that demographic— the one composed of the mentally indisposed to the normal barbarian— understands his paper at all. His relatively complicated and convoluted way of explaining his argument is his way of subtly insulting those who do not and cannot understand him, and— at the same time— this is his tool to weed out those from whom he would not derive appropriate reactions from, anyways. Those who understand his way of writing, or the "intelligent" people, are the individuals closest to the "truth", or what we regard to be the truth. When these people begin to question "truth", a concept they all believe themselves to be well-versed in, due to their own supposed intelligence, it's quite a spectacle to an amused Nietzsche.

My two cents. I might as well kick off this discussion.