As promised:
Rhetoric 1A, second essay prompts
Drafts of this paper are due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, November 2, and final versions are due at 4pm on Monday, November 8 in the box in front of 7408 Dwinelle. Both your draft and your final version should be 5-6 pages long, and should employ standard formatting (double-spaced, 12pt Times New Roman or equivalent, standard margins, etc).
Choose one of the topics below, or feel free to make up your own. These topics are means only to be rough guidelines here to help you direct your thinking; we encourage you to use them as starting points, rather than prescriptions to be rigidly adhered to.
1. Our discussion of “Their Eyes Were Watching God” addressed numerous themes that work their way through the book. Among these one might include (but would certainly not be limited to): judgment and the idea of God; the relationship between inside and outside; speech, silence and multi-vocality; individual identity vs. communal identity; animality; figurative language and its relation to selfhood; play; men’s ways of knowing and being vs. women’s. In your paper, take a single theme from the book (this may be one of the above or anything else you’ve noticed), describe how it plays out in the book, and make an argument about what that theme means for the book as a whole. While doing so will likely necessitate your looking at at least two moments in the book, you want to make sure that your paper doesn’t just note that these two moments exist and that they help elaborate one of the main ideas of the book; you want to make sure that your paper makes a claim about what the moments or the idea you’re examining help us see or understand about the book as a whole that isn’t available upon initial or superficial reading.
2. In our discussions of the 'vernacular' one phenomena that has come up repeatedly has been artists’ having created a variation of another work as a mode of reply or response to it. We’ve seen this strategy at work in Hughes’ response to Whitman, Jimi Hendrix’s reading of “The Star Spangled Banner,” Aretha Franklin’s reworking of Otis Redding’s composition, and even, perhaps, Nina Simone’s modification of the generic Broadway show tune. Write a paper that addresses this idea of variation as response, using one or more of the above examples, or another pairing that fits. As usual, you don’t just want to note that one artist uses another’s work as the opportunity for response, but to use the pairing to engage some deeper questions about the nature of the reworking you’re examining and the questions it raises. To what extent, for example, do these variations on more canonical poems or songs express a style that is independent and original, as opposed to one that is merely parasitic? What does this strategy of variation accomplish that a more “original” piece of art can’t (if anything)? Are these artists of 'response' simply rebelling against established cultural ideas, or are they also preserving them in some way, and if so, why does this sort of preservation matter, at least as the works you’re examining see it?
3. Both "The Old People" and "A Rose for Emily" have endings that radically alter our perception of events that occur throughout narration of the story. Strange or perplexing details make sense in light of the endings of these stories, giving us a sense of resolution and understanding that can only come retrospectively, as it were. This is one of many strategies Faulkner uses to vary the linear sequence of narration, so as to change our experience of time. Through a comparison of these two stories, and by using specific scenes and examples, discuss how Faulkner engages themes of time, repetition and memory through his form (the way the story is organized). If possible, try to relate these ideas of time to the thematic content of the stories – blood ties and family, heritage, melancholic clinging to the past, ghosts, identity, etc.